And just a point to make - the fossil fuel companies themselves are the biggest funders of the energy transition. When you talk about "Climate Change Alarmist pro-corruption groups", fossil fuel corporations are in that group. That's not a smear. And calling a lobby group a lobby group isn't a smear either.
And just a point to make - the fossil fuel companies themselves are the biggest funders of the energy transition. When you talk about "Climate Change Alarmist pro-corruption groups", fossil fuel corporations are in that group. That's not a smear. And calling a lobby group a lobby group isn't a smear either.
Fine, than you can equally well call Greenpeace, WWF, NRDC, RMI, FOE, Sierra Club, EDF, WISE, hundreds of others Lobby Groups as well. They both do the same thing, except on opposite sides of the fence. And big difference those groups get many $billions/yr in funding vs groups that don't promote Alarmism get $millions/yr in funding. I bet Net Zero Watch gets funding that WWF, Greenpeace would call lunch money. And oddly enough a lot of Big Oil $billionaire funding goes to the Alarmist groups rather than the rational energy policy groups.
I would say you're right, considering NZW is a British lobbyist group that aims to lobby the British government and British political circles. WWF / Green Peace are global organisations after all. I didn't realise calling a lobby group a lobby group was contentious.
And just a point to make - the fossil fuel companies themselves are the biggest funders of the energy transition. When you talk about "Climate Change Alarmist pro-corruption groups", fossil fuel corporations are in that group. That's not a smear. And calling a lobby group a lobby group isn't a smear either.
Fine, than you can equally well call Greenpeace, WWF, NRDC, RMI, FOE, Sierra Club, EDF, WISE, hundreds of others Lobby Groups as well. They both do the same thing, except on opposite sides of the fence. And big difference those groups get many $billions/yr in funding vs groups that don't promote Alarmism get $millions/yr in funding. I bet Net Zero Watch gets funding that WWF, Greenpeace would call lunch money. And oddly enough a lot of Big Oil $billionaire funding goes to the Alarmist groups rather than the rational energy policy groups.
I would say you're right, considering NZW is a British lobbyist group that aims to lobby the British government and British political circles. WWF / Green Peace are global organisations after all. I didn't realise calling a lobby group a lobby group was contentious.